Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
1. 11 Jul 2009 07:39 | ||
Sorry I have to bring this up, it should have to be. |
||
2. 11 Jul 2009 08:48 | ||
km, I noticed this last night, and so dissappointed that "many" were voted low, and many, that were voted low were daily drawers. I suppose the persons who did this feel elated and some what powerful. There are other ways to have fun and games on this site. |
||
3. 11 Jul 2009 15:10 | ||
Mmm ... it's a pity. Dreamweaver's 'girl at vanity' has the highest votes in showcase and it's been knocked down to 4.75 ... there's a lot of pictures that don't belong in there, too. |
||
4. 11 Jul 2009 18:53 | ||
It happened in the "Light" showcase, too. We can't control it, so I'm just ignoring it. |
||
5. 12 Jul 2009 01:57 | ||
Altough we know that there is some evil lurking in Tdland, a part of it is what i would call the summer solstice. Its that time of year when the youngun's are out of school and probably spend a lot of time on the computer. Those on the artistic side might be drawn to this site for the same reason a lot of us are, to express ourselves. When i first came here, I didn't know what a 5 was or a 1. They could be thinking that a 1 is the highest vote or best vote you can get!. I don't think it explains that anywhere except for our monthly complaints about the "vote down". The other part is what I always say "it is what it is" and its not going to change. Kids play and adults do too. The showcase has become a "nocase" as far as I'm concerned. Its supposed to show off your work, not have it buried like the regular gallery. I'm done with this subject. At least for another month. lol. |
||
6. 12 Jul 2009 06:21 | ||
yep, me too -- 'cept for my monthly echo: |
||
7. 12 Jul 2009 06:26 | ||
I sometimes think that these threads "trigger" increased low voting. "They" seem to thrive when they see we get upset. What if we just ignored it for a bit, hard as it may be? |
||
8. 12 Jul 2009 06:55 | ||
I made the comment because I think it's mean and immature to do that. There's bigger issues to address. It's right up there with throwing tomatoes at someone or buckets of paint on their work. Just mean. |
||
9. 12 Jul 2009 07:52 | ||
Well, I am going to ignore it! It's very upsetting to see the vote down, but then this a.m. realized it really doesn't matter, as these drawings will be in the TOP 5. |
||
10. 12 Jul 2009 08:13 | ||
I feel the more we comment on the troll/s's activities, the more satisfaction he/she/it/they get, and the more voting down he/she/it/they will do...... |
||
11. 12 Jul 2009 08:44 | ||
I know we can't do anything about. I'm stressing that it is just Sad. |
||
12. 13 Jul 2009 15:35 | ||
lilalee, actually the ones that have been voted down won't be in the top five. It is very rare for a picture that doesn't have a perfect 5 vote to make top 5, no matter how many votes it got. |
||
13. 13 Jul 2009 20:14 | ||
nod --- which makes Top 5 a bit of a farce these days. |
||
14. 13 Jul 2009 21:01 | ||
|
||
15. 14 Jul 2009 16:08 | ||
hm. What if the system is NOT broken, but functioning as it's actually meant to... |
||
16. 14 Jul 2009 17:48 | ||
The same thought had occurred to me, Qsilv. I threw the thought out as 'daft' ... but it keeps revisiting me. |
||
17. 14 Jul 2009 18:18 | ||
|
||
18. 14 Jul 2009 19:04 | ||
Rachel wouldn't need to. She could simply allow users to do it.... there are always such people available. |
||
19. 14 Jul 2009 20:44 | ||
Experiment or not... This site has given to me more than I can give back... I was 41 yrs old when my wife introduced me to it... |
||
20. 14 Jul 2009 22:04 | ||
I totally agree, as I've said to many when they start complaining about the whole thing, "Then don't come on." |