Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
161. 1 Jan 2010 15:34 | ||
May we have a showcase for drawings in 'Faces'. I would hate to see this category disappear. |
||
162. 1 Jan 2010 15:53 | ||
I think putting 'faces' back in Top5 would work better... |
||
163. 5 Jan 2010 07:04 | ||
I hope this can be read by Rachel Lee. It's again to ask you about the promised new theme or category. You said in June/July that it would take about two months. I would appreciate it if you could tell us something about it since Avatars was not so widely accepted. |
||
164. 5 Jan 2010 08:55 | ||
Is it just me, or does it seem like there are a whole lot of pictures in the Showcase that have absolutly nothing to do with 'Beginnings'? I know it happens with every showcase that people throw things in there that don't belong either because they don't understand how it works or because they're trying to get their pic noticed or something, but I was just looking at the current one and it looked like there were only a few that actually fit. |
||
165. 5 Jan 2010 09:04 | ||
Actually, I was a bit confused about this showcase. I mean, it sounds like such a general theme: starting from the Big Bang, going to anything that dates back to the beginning of humanity, of the plannet (or whatever) almost anything can be related to the showcase. Then I remembered the original suggestion was birth so I threw a cute baby playing in there (as a beginning of...erm... developing intelligence? ) .So i guess, sometimes maybe the author can see a connection with a showcase that it's not immediately obvious to the others. And, yes, sometimes it's an 'accurate' missuse of a showcase. |
||
166. 5 Jan 2010 13:53 | ||
It's not just you Dragon and I'm glad you've brought it up. I always expect that in the current showcase, things will get filtered out eventually. However, I do admit to being a bit mystified, as to why the first two highest voted pictures of the last showcase were there. They were definitely award winning, there's no doubt about that, but what was the connection? Can someone enlighten me? |
||
167. 6 Jan 2010 10:35 | ||
One of those two artists admitted to being in competition with someone else and put it in showcase to get more votes. They are both excellent drawings and were always going to be winners so why they did that I fail to understand. |
||
168. 6 Jan 2010 12:14 | ||
Oh...I'd very curious to know if I guessed this right: was there a competition between the second pic and the first? Anyway, Login is right, both pics are wonderful and would've been noticed without being added to the showcase. |
||
169. 7 Jan 2010 04:16 | ||
marius brought this up in another thread, has not seen it mentioned elsewhere and it sort of fits in with showcases ... but it'd be nice if there were separate galleries that featured previously submitted work in a category format. |
||
170. 7 Jan 2010 04:18 | ||
Thanks for the comments about the 'Beginnings' Showcase. We have tried to clear it up as best as possible - if your picture has been wrongly removed, please just write to let us know. |
||
171. 7 Jan 2010 06:12 | ||
marius has had a brilliant idea, especially if speaking about portraits and landscapes. Maybe it's difficult to implement. |
||
172. 7 Jan 2010 15:54 | ||
hmm.. what about |
||
173. 7 Jan 2010 17:52 | ||
I loved one of the challenges that was fables. We could make a showcase of that. Or bugs. Or how about an "I Spy"? My son thinks that would be fun. Kind of like the books where you look for hidden objects. |
||
174. 8 Jan 2010 02:57 | ||
I would like to see Qsilv's challenge in a showcase... It was BY FAR the most popular challenge we have ever had... It was called Challenge XXII - Seeing Double!!... |
||
175. 8 Jan 2010 02:59 | ||
mmm.. Rachel.. could we have.. |
||
176. 8 Jan 2010 05:37 | ||
Nice idea, matthew ... but it's in the wrong forum. |
||
177. 8 Jan 2010 05:49 | ||
no, no, Login.. ignore 98% of what matthew said and just look at the salient first 11 words.. |
||
178. 8 Jan 2010 06:00 | ||
How is a showcase suggestion in the showcase suggestions forum wrong??? |
||
179. 8 Jan 2010 06:17 | ||
matthew.. |
||
180. 8 Jan 2010 10:31 | ||
lol... well I like it too and might love to see it again in a year... |