Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
21. 6 Apr 2009 07:55 | ||
OK.. what's 't.p.' ? .. before I hazard a guess.. |
||
22. 6 Apr 2009 08:04 | ||
marg, 't.p.' is toilet paper. Kugusch mentioned her nine-year-old's collection. |
||
23. 6 Apr 2009 08:34 | ||
Duhh.. my apologies for not picking up on that one.. second thoughts, I retract my apologies ! |
||
24. 6 Apr 2009 08:37 | ||
psssst.... marg! ctrl-c, ctrl-v |
||
25. 6 Apr 2009 08:49 | ||
(MBone)...(MB1)...(Mblessed1) |
||
26. 6 Apr 2009 08:50 | ||
Hmm.. oh enlightened one.. that's fine if you know in advance that you're gunna want to type it out again ! |
||
27. 6 Apr 2009 14:47 | ||
ok, Q, give it up! You'll make a little girl very happy LOL. |
||
28. 6 Apr 2009 19:19 | ||
Well........... I dunno if this will amuse her (and/or you) or turn her all envious, but... truthfully, my all time fave's some appallingly stiff pink stuff with --I swear-- lacy almost microscopic holes all through it. Came out of the middle east in the 80's. |
||
29. 7 Apr 2009 00:26 | ||
rofl...I'm trying to decide whether you're serious or just pulling my leg. I couldn't possibly have found another t.p. collector!?!?!?!? That's the problem when you can't see facial expressions or hear the pitch of a voice. |
||
30. 7 Apr 2009 01:08 | ||
Marg - Originally, I applied for shorter name, but was informed my choices were already taken. But Matthew's suggestions look pretty workable. You could also go with "Ann". Might confuse others, but I would know who you were talking to |
||
31. 7 Apr 2009 02:39 | ||
Oh, I'm interested in all sorts of odd things... my friends and family all know it and occasionally sacrifice their own reputation to bring me souvenirs, or at least photos... ("Why are you photographing the street kerb??" "... taking the lid off the toilet tank???" "It's just a light bulb for heaven's sakes!") |
||
32. 7 Apr 2009 10:42 | ||
cool link, thanks! I'll have to go through that with her as soon as time allows, I've saved it. Again I'm amazed at what all is available on the internet LOL. |
||
33. 13 Apr 2009 21:43 | ||
How did you request this showcase? |
||
34. 14 Apr 2009 00:06 | ||
Hi Aira.. |
||
35. 14 Apr 2009 03:17 | ||
I used to work in a computer animation house in the early 80's. (I know, I'm dating myself) Although I was responsible for shooting the amination, I was exposed to some extremely talented cel animators from all walks of life. We could spend days and days shooting a 30 second spot. The task was difficult, but then watching the finished product was quite rewarding. I know I am rambling, but the mention of playing back animation pieces from TD had me thinking, and wanting to let you all know a piece of what it was like back in the day before video cameras, and we were only using film. |
||
36. 14 Apr 2009 05:33 | ||
Hey, zeksam.. |
||
37. 14 Apr 2009 05:46 | ||
Hey Marg, |
||
38. 14 Apr 2009 06:07 | ||
No way..! |
||
39. 14 Apr 2009 07:12 | ||
Yes, Steenbeck were being used by many people who worked within the production process. The name is so familiar, but can't remember specifically who used it. Fun hearing the word Steenbeck, haven't heard it in over 20 or 25 years. Interesting about the specifics of perserving a film. Work like that is priceless, and many people will have you to thank in the future. We take so much for granted, preservation of art being one of them. |
||
40. 14 Apr 2009 08:04 | ||
Sorry.. I said that wrong - I just found out about the work being done - there was actually a really great young Canadian guy, who was master-minding the work (and continuing his predecessors' efforts !) |