Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
1. 25 Apr 2012 06:18 | ||
These are helpful in |
||
2. 25 Apr 2012 06:27 | ||
I do believe we've all wished for these.- i know i have. |
||
3. 2 May 2012 21:34 | ||
Typoss are common and so are hasty remarks, A real pity that such a commonly found option is missing. Private messaging is also something I miss here. Blogging privileges would also improve the forum. |
||
4. 2 May 2012 23:51 | ||
I thought about the edit option, or rather the lack of it, when my typos first made me crazy a couple of years back, and then it occurred to me it why it actually makes sense not to have it — the value of comments on pictures is that they are spontaneous first impressions. Even in forums, there's a live-wire quality to the discussions that would soon be edited away if we all started trying to sound eloquent or level-headed or whatever. Much as we as individuals would prefer to look good to posterity, and recover our dignity after blurting out or revealing something that would have been better left unsaid, the site as whole would start to die if everything was always being watered down or refined or tweaked to seem more witty or whatever. |
||
5. 2 May 2012 23:59 | ||
Right now I would edit what I just wrote twenty seconds ago if I had the chance. But suppose it got a couple of replies and THEN I decided to edit it — I might delete or alter what someone else had been replying to, and then THEIR comment would look dumb and pointless. Then they'd want to edit theirs, and so on, and on, and on. Someone arriving fresh at that forum would have no idea what was going on, because there wouldn't be an unfolding dialogue follow, just a series of individual remarks that might each be perfect but wouldn't connect. |
||
6. 3 May 2012 00:01 | ||
an unfolding dialogue TO follow, I meant to say. (How come we don't have an edit function here dammit!) |
||
7. 3 May 2012 15:09 | ||
Should said "darn it!" - sorry! (The case against the edit option gets weaker with every retraction and correction, but I still think my points were valid after replies appear and a dialogue starts to develop.) |
||
8. 4 May 2012 06:05 | ||
Mmm.. all I can say is that you've said it all, chelydra - and what a brilliant pic you have as your profile |
||
9. 4 May 2012 08:27 | ||
Oops — I meant to write I "should HAVE said darn it". Oy vey. |
||
10. 5 May 2012 07:53 | ||
Many websites I have seen restrict the editing time to a few minutes after the initial draft. These websites are doing just fine. |
||
11. 6 May 2012 14:08 | ||
So the notorious Radrook had already answered my question (posed in a PS to my latest long Quarantined Acrimonious Rant). Implementing this 5-minute grace period would do wonders for almost everything I post, and I'm not the only who gets bogged down in appending corrections, then correcting the corrections, ad absurdum. Let's do it, and then when the restless ghost of Radrook lurks invisible in our midst, he may be reminded that he doesn't always have to be such a useless prick. |