Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
501. 4 Jun 2009 08:26 | ||
Let's all celebrate with cream cheese, red onion and chopped boiled egg sandwiches un bulkie rolls. |
||
502. 4 Jun 2009 08:27 | ||
And now you have hit 501. But I've gotta run and do errands now. I'll look forward to reading the next 499 threads! |
||
503. 4 Jun 2009 08:28 | ||
-501 +503, -499, +497 |
||
504. 4 Jun 2009 08:59 | ||
-u +o |
||
505. 4 Jun 2009 09:53 | ||
B, I find you infinitely more entertaining than Seinfeld ever did! You actually impart wisdom/learning at times! |
||
506. 4 Jun 2009 10:14 | ||
Yes, the closest Seinfeld ever came to cooking tips was how to order from the Soup Nazi |
||
507. 4 Jun 2009 11:17 | ||
I read in some article about his program that the set designer decided that Seinfeld would keep his boxes of cereal in alphabetical order so indeed they are arranged that way in his kitchen. |
||
508. 4 Jun 2009 11:30 | ||
Here is a good Latin to English dictionary on line, to help you with that labelling. |
||
509. 4 Jun 2009 11:31 | ||
There's always the internet! |
||
510. 4 Jun 2009 11:31 | ||
I arrange all my movies in alphabetic order by title except my James Bond collection, they're arranged by year of release (though they're all under B for Bond on the shelf) The titles also have to go in the same direction or it bothers me until I fix it. That's my one OCD issue. |
||
511. 4 Jun 2009 11:49 | ||
Thank You, I'll check the Notre Dame link IamAnonymous. |
||
512. 4 Jun 2009 12:02 | ||
As for Dvds they are sorted alphabetically but given the caveat that collections stay together and are sorted chronologically. So the Harry Potter films would go under 'H' for Harry, and within that category 'HP and the Sorcerer's Stone' would go before HP and Hagrid's Goiter'. |
||
513. 4 Jun 2009 12:06 | ||
I no longer have the books, but trying to put Marion Zimmer Bradley's 'Darkover' books in order would be a complete nightmare. |
||
514. 4 Jun 2009 12:19 | ||
I read a series of books once and each successive book takes place a few hundred years before the previous book. It was very unusual and compelling. Wish I could remember the titles or author, it was many years ago. |
||
515. 4 Jun 2009 12:20 | ||
Re: Star Trek in order, wouldn't you put DS9 before Voyager, it was out a few seasons previous. |
||
516. 4 Jun 2009 12:30 | ||
Baldur, the spine labels on some of your DVDs being the wrong way round, reminds me of my own irritation with book spines. UK book titles all face the same way on the spines, whereas books bought in other european countries tend to face in the opposite direction. Consequently, a large proportion of our books are upside down in the bookcase, simply to get them all facing the same way. |
||
517. 4 Jun 2009 14:43 | ||
I could switch Deep Space Nine and Voyager's place, they pretty much covered the same time period. I hated Deep Space Nine however and so probably would never own the DVDs anyway |
||
518. 4 Jun 2009 14:48 | ||
I watched very little DS9 though I admit it improved when Worf arrived. |
||
519. 4 Jun 2009 14:52 | ||
The series I watched the most of was 'Voyager'. |
||
520. 4 Jun 2009 14:53 | ||
And as a bonus they used a tactic on the Borg that I had been screaming at my television set for years. Somebody finally heard me. They used the transporter to beam a photon torpedo into the Borg cube. |