Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
41. 5 Feb 2009 05:38 | ||
Oh my, where is all this animosity coming from?! |
||
42. 5 Feb 2009 05:55 | ||
puzzler, you clearly deserve to be there! |
||
43. 5 Feb 2009 09:47 | ||
I agree Luna... Though maybe instead of the artist choosing which category the voters choose...? |
||
44. 5 Feb 2009 09:53 | ||
I think that if everyone just settled down and gave Rachel time to resolve the problem you would all have more time to comment on my pictures... |
||
45. 5 Feb 2009 09:55 | ||
I can't comment why I am ROFLMAO.... OMG!!! Autumn you are too funny... |
||
46. 5 Feb 2009 11:03 | ||
To be honest, I just do the occasional picture because it's a unique medium and fun. I love the comments but can take or leave the ratings. On balance I think you should be able to rate 1-100 and then divide the cumulative total by the number of votes cast to get an average. In that way you could give yong talent an encouraging 60 or so, spoiling votes would have a more minimal impact and only really impressive pictures could get near 100. This would also encourage the '5 only' voters to give a realistic score and should result in the really good pictures getting prominence. Alternatively, just do the pictures for fun and not worry about the rating. I'd really lthink a top 5 category for under 16's should be introduced as well. |
||
47. 5 Feb 2009 11:05 | ||
It should have read 'I really think a top 5 category fo the under 16's should be introduced as well' |
||
48. 5 Feb 2009 11:05 | ||
It should have read 'for' - I'll give up commenting now!!! |
||
49. 5 Feb 2009 11:38 | ||
I am a '5 only' voter and I'm pretty sure I would just turn into a '100 only' voter...so I vote for vote no vote....and maybe different levels, like beginner, intermediate, advanced.... |
||
50. 5 Feb 2009 11:48 | ||
It would be a shame to be a '100 only' voter, as you could save your 100 vote for truly outstanding work. I would hope that an average picture would gain 60% or so average and a really good picture would finish up around 85%. That would leave the 100s for the Tigers Eye type of exceptional image, and give encouragement to everyone (especially the younger members) to gradually improve their techniques and votes. |
||
51. 15 Feb 2009 22:51 | ||
...Well said Grahame... |
||
52. 16 Feb 2009 02:30 | ||
..guess I've said it before (as most of us have), but.. can't we just get rid of 'highest rated' totally ? remove the whole idea from this website ? |
||
53. 16 Feb 2009 03:18 | ||
...This drawing... |
||
54. 16 Feb 2009 03:30 | ||
hmm.. does that mean that you agree with my suggestion of removing the 'highest rated' totally, matt ? |
||
55. 16 Feb 2009 03:32 | ||
DUH!!! Have I not screamed enough about it??? |
||
56. 17 Feb 2009 10:23 | ||
(smiling slowwwly at you guys as I read these recent posts) |