Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
21. 3 Dec 2009 11:34 | ||
I beg your pardon, but he was scourged beore they wounded his side. |
||
22. 3 Dec 2009 11:36 | ||
so all of that was to say that i think Matthew's depiction is accurate. |
||
23. 3 Dec 2009 11:50 | ||
You're right pollyesther. |
||
24. 3 Dec 2009 12:24 | ||
You are right! Sorry! |
||
25. 3 Dec 2009 13:48 | ||
Wasn't it that thirty lashes would kill a man, but Jesus only got 39? That's what my ministor told me... |
||
26. 4 Dec 2009 02:22 | ||
The single spear to the side happened on the cross... The horrific beating Jesus took was prior to being hung up on it... |
||
27. 4 Dec 2009 05:32 | ||
Not unlike beating this subject to death. Let it rest, for goodness sake! |
||
28. 4 Dec 2009 06:16 | ||
I agree, Robin. Better not to stir it all up again. |
||
29. 4 Dec 2009 09:43 | ||
Heaven forbid we talk about Jesus in a forum thread about a Jesus pic... |
||
30. 4 Dec 2009 10:01 | ||
My point isn't about talking about Jesus. It's about talking about the Jesus pic being censored over and over again. It was censored months and months and months ago and this is about the twentieth time we've all had to hear about it. At some point it seems like rehashing it yet again is just a way to call more attention to it. If you look at it that way, it's been seen now by way more people than it would have been in the gallery, so let it go now. Sorry if this offends. |
||
31. 4 Dec 2009 11:36 | ||
Ah, no offense taken... While it is censored I will continue to talk about it... I will gladly let it drop... When it is no longer censored... |
||
32. 4 Dec 2009 13:49 | ||
Matthew, watch out, I own sarcasm and didn't give you permission to use it. |
||
33. 4 Dec 2009 14:14 | ||
Oh I do love sarcasm... but then I like almost all humor tools... But I wasn't being sarcastic... |
||
34. 4 Dec 2009 14:17 | ||
Matthew, did you send a feedback to TD mentioning all the votes here for lifting the censorship? |
||
35. 4 Dec 2009 14:23 | ||
Not as of yet... |
||
36. 4 Dec 2009 15:07 | ||
Comment #29, wasn't that sarcasm? |
||
37. 4 Dec 2009 15:12 | ||
...lol... Yes... Very much so... I had forgotten that one & thought you referred to the one that followed... |
||
38. 4 Dec 2009 15:29 | ||
If there's a sarcasm tax I'm in serious trouble. |
||
39. 4 Dec 2009 16:06 | ||
Was that sarcasm? |
||
40. 4 Dec 2009 16:34 | ||
One sarcasm equals 1 million dollars. |