Author | Comment | |
---|---|---|
1. 6 Feb 2009 07:14 | ||
The solution is so obvious. I will NOT reveal the user's ID in case I'm wrong. But there is only ONE single user in the Highest Rated view of the Gallery whose personal gallery's Highest Rated matches their Most Ratings. |
||
2. 6 Feb 2009 07:22 | ||
I just went through all the forums and verified this particular user has no interest in the issue of the ratings system - or at least posting about the issue anyways... |
||
3. 6 Feb 2009 08:18 | ||
Ron, |
||
4. 6 Feb 2009 09:13 | ||
Shhhhh.... |
||
5. 6 Feb 2009 09:16 | ||
Matthew - of course you're correct. Which is why I'm not revealing the username. |
||
6. 6 Feb 2009 09:26 | ||
...Again, on every pic my wife has that has a perfect 5 average has more that 10 votes... |
||
7. 6 Feb 2009 09:44 | ||
Oh my God! Our secret is out! How could you just BLAB it out like that! We're doomed! |
||
8. 6 Feb 2009 11:35 | ||
I know who santa is... i'm not gonna tell u tho! MUAHAHAHAHAHHA |
||
9. 6 Feb 2009 11:36 | ||
I'm not really sure I understand what you mean Ron. I've been trying to follow along on all the ratings stuff, but it mostly leaves me confused. So how does one even determine that "highest & most ratings match"? Argh! I feel I'm so over my head.... |
||
10. 6 Feb 2009 11:54 | ||
if u go to your picture gallery, theres an option up the top to see it displayed as "most ratings" or "highest ratings" |
||
11. 6 Feb 2009 12:09 | ||
Wow! Thank you Ernie. You explained it perfectly. And all this time when I'd really wanted to check out the spectacular artwork, I had been searching the "highest rated" databank instead of the "most ratings" one. So there's no telling how much super cool stuff I've missed. Now I need to go take a peak and leave everyone else to decide on how to do the ratings. Thanks again. |
||
12. 6 Feb 2009 12:35 | ||
ron, everyone has been victim to some kind of blitz or sabotage at some point. |
||
13. 7 Feb 2009 11:57 | ||
I wish I had never posted this topic. |
||
14. 12 Feb 2009 21:08 | ||
We are all just posting our feelings and frustrations. I suspect many of us are depressed over this, I know I am. I feel this just has gone on way too long without any word that anything is being done. Of course if something is in the works we can't be told but just not knowing one way or the other is driving me crazy. |
||
15. 13 Feb 2009 00:35 | ||
likemee got me thinking. I don't think anyone that is doing this has left the site but I have noticed that most pictures that are shoot down are shoot down twice instead of once. I still only have one person in mind but it is possible there are more than one or that one person has found a way to vote twice. |
||
16. 13 Feb 2009 03:04 | ||
.. well.. apart from any other considerations, any of us can create as many email addresses as we want.. |
||
17. 13 Feb 2009 05:37 | ||
(Marg, I thought of that too but I don't think so now) I got every picture this time that had a possibility to go anywhere voted down and most voted down twice. The person I have in mind is going to win top 5 if voting happened now, because of this voting down. I never knew how to tell who had the possibility until yesterday. I just found out how to get the score count for each picture so once I knew that everything made sense to me including top rated and best score or whatever those pull down options are called. All you have to do is go to top rated, or whatever it is called, and look through them to find the current pics and then count off the first 5. Most that will get in the top 5 as of now will be low count pictures that didn't get hit. |
||
18. 13 Feb 2009 05:40 | ||
I was talking about the friends being in with it too, I don't think that is the case now. |
||
19. 13 Feb 2009 06:16 | ||
DMarla - I know who it is, no doubt in my mind! |
||
20. 13 Feb 2009 06:23 | ||
I'm sure some of the friends know and that makes them as bad the "Blitzer". They might think it's funny, but they're just as bad! |